Issues and application
Nic Marks, Sam Thompson
21 October 2008
We consider approaches to measuring well-being from the perspective of their utility for policy-making.
We focus on subjective indicators and consider a number of relevant issues, including: philosophical debate around the role of government in promoting well-being; using well-being indicators as leading or lagging indicators; different approaches to well-being across the life course; and technical limitations of subjective indicators. Our report concludes with a summary of recent exploratory work on well-being for local government.
Under a reasonably broad definition, well-being has been the subject of considerable recent discussion in policy circles. Examples include:
Dolan et al. reviewed a range of theoretical approaches to well-being drawn from different disciplines and outlined a taxonomy of well-being models in terms of their underlying conceptual approach: 1) preference satisfaction; 2) basic needs; 3) flourishing; 4) hedonic; and 5) evaluative. Whilst it is tempting to see these different approaches as competing with one another, we argue that it is more helpful for policy-makers to view well-being itself as a dynamic process, in which a person’s external circumstances interact with their psychological resources to satisfy – to a greater or lesser extent – their psychological needs and to give rise to positive feelings of happiness and satisfaction.
NEF hosted a workshop with policy-makers from across government. The core of this workshop was a SWOT –Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats – analysis of issues surrounding the use of well-being indicators in policy. In the negative side, an important issue was clarity, in relation both to the distinction between well-being and happiness, and also to measurement and communication. On the positive side, it was noted that well-being is an explicit part of policy discourse across a number of different areas, and also that it is a good fit with several emerging agendas that are not currently using the language of well-being.
Despite considerable and rapidly growing interest, indicators of subjective well-being have not been widely used in policy. Recent work by NEF has begun to develop a framework to help local authorities approach the issue of choosing an appropriate well-being indicator. It outlines three broad approaches to well-being measurement that are of relevance to policy-makers:
The New Economics Foundation depends on its supporters’ generosity. If you value what we do, please consider making a donation.
We can't settle for awareness without proper mental health funding for prevention and treatment.
Sarah Arnold, Daniel Button
22 May 2020
Green space is important for wellbeing but in poorer areas visits to parks have dropped.
Alex Chapman, Jasmeet Phagoora
09 May 2020
Looking after yourself and others during the coronavirus crisis.
30 March 2020
Latest episode of our award winning podcast - subscribe on iTunes!
15 July 2019