Replacing London City Airport
Elizabeth Cox, Helen Kersley
10 April 2014
London City Airport occupies a large and valuable strip of land at the heart of London. Does it make sense to locate an airport in such precious inner-city space? What if we reclaimed this historic site and built a new neighbourhood, incorporating the best thinking about sustainable urban design?
The Royal Docks is an important area of the UK capital. London City Airport occupies land that could be redeveloped as a sustainable and socially just neighbourhood, complementing current regeneration plans for east London and inspiring transformation across the capital and beyond.
With the real and pressing need to transform our cities for a sustainable future, we must begin to seriously question the logic of locating an airport on precious inner city land. We can and should close London City Airport.
Set in a prime location, London City Airport carries a very high opportunity cost in the traditional economic sense, but also in a social and environmental sense. It contributes to London’s poor air quality, carbon emissions and community blight in surrounding Newham (already one of London’s most deprived boroughs), and causes noise pollution across much of east and south-east London. Generating relatively few jobs for locals, its benefits are felt almost exclusively by wealthy business people travelling to and from Canary Wharf and the City of London.
Now is the perfect time to think about alternatives. Crossrail, due to be operational within five years, will dramatically cut journey times between east and central London and London-area airports, allowing City workers to access Heathrow in just 30 minutes. At the same time, the current review of aviation capacity in the south-east should give us a chance to radically rethink the management of UK aviation.
With 70% of the world population expected to live in urban areas by 2050, cities must lead the way in demonstrating how we can rapidly reduce carbon emissions, live within our environmental limits and achieve a fairer distribution of economic benefits. If London City Airport was closed, we could replace it with a beacon of innovation that could generate huge value to the local community and Londoners more widely. This report explores an alternative vision for the site. Based on examples of sustainable cities worldwide and conversations with local people and experts – including architects, planners, social geographers and investors – we identified six key characteristics of the new sustainable neighbourhood:
Cities can evolve into net producers of renewable energy, food production centres and convivial places to live and work. But this means taking a much broader view of value-creation, encompassing social and environmental as well as economic benefits now and in the long-run. It also encourages thinking about who value is created for when land is used for particular purposes. We need to transform current patterns that lock local people out of their own neighbourhoods – through deprivation, inequality of resources, or through lack of a local voice.
Our argument is that more healthy, resilient and sustainable economies will depend on a framework for fairness and access to decent livelihoods; a framework that creates opportunities to achieve greater well-being for everyone.
If you back a recovery plan based around great public services, protecting the planet and reducing inequality, please support NEF to build back better.
A senior banker’s comments show we can’t rely on banks to respond to the climate crisis
15 June 2022
Five ways the government’s irresponsible plans for aviation are putting us all at risk
25 April 2022
Help us support local communities fighting high-carbon expansions
22 April 2022
Next steps for the European Central Bank to support the low-carbon transition
06 April 2022