What are the appropriate indicators of wellbeing inequality?
17 May 2018
Policy makers and academics are increasingly interested in wellbeing inequality. The vast majority of academic studies into wellbeing inequality currently use standard deviation of personal wellbeing measures such as self-reported life satisfaction or happiness. However, there has so far only been limited debate on whether standard deviation is the most appropriate measure, and its choice is rarely justified.
This working paper presents research commissioned by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and carried out by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) in collaboration with the What Works Centre for Well-being. NEF was tasked with exploring the strengths and weaknesses of different measures of wellbeing inequality and to make a recommendation of a measure which could be reported by the ONS alongside mean wellbeing.
We identified three distinct reasons why people cared about wellbeing inequality. These were:
This paper aims to open up discussion about appropriate indicators of wellbeing inequality. Based on analysis so far, we propose using a threshold for a single national indicator. Further work is needed to identify which threshold to use, although interviewees suggested 4, 5 or 6 on a scale of 0 – 10.
However, different indicators may be used for different purposes. We encourage researchers to reflect on which wellbeing inequality measure they choose and for a broader debate between key stakeholders on appropriate wellbeing inequality measures for different purposes.
Building a wellbeing economy
The New Economics Foundation depends on its supporters’ generosity. If you value what we do, please consider making a donation.
Latest episode of our award winning podcast - subscribe on iTunes!
15 July 2019
If history is any guide, we should pay attention to New Zealand
10 July 2019
Without a power analysis, wellbeing economics misses the mark
20 March 2019
Latest episode of our award winning podcast – subscribe on iTunes!
05 February 2019