We need a transformation in welfare provision, but even more important are measures to tackle the underlying causes of inequality.
Anna Coote, Jane Franklin
04 May 2010
Over sixty years we have grown accustomed to benefits and services provided by the welfare state. All the while, the volume of provision has expanded exponentially, driven by a growing and ageing population, by rising public expectations, and in some cases, notably healthcare, by scientific advances and by supply driving up demand. This expansion was possible because the economy continued to grow.
Then came the collapse of global financial systems and a steep economic downturn from which ‘recovery’ is uncertain. Furthermore, the prospect of more economic growth is problematic: evidence suggests that growth in the ‘developed’ world cannot be ‘decoupled’ from carbon emissions sufficiently and in time to avoid catastrophic climate change.
So it makes sense to plan for minimal growth or none at all. In that case, what will become of the welfare state? Deep cuts are already planned by the Labour government and by the Tories — and neither party has yet contemplated a future without growth. What should be saved and what thrown overboard? More important, how could and should the welfare system be restructured?
Originally published in Soundings 44.
If you back a recovery plan based around great public services, protecting the planet and reducing inequality, please support NEF to build back better.
Analysing options for systemic change to transform the world’s economic and financial systems after the pandemic
Chaitanya Kumar, Andrew Pendleton, Jonathan Barth, Lucas Coscieme, Andreas Dimmelmeier, Katherine Trebeck, Sarah Mewes, Isabel Nuesse
11 January 2021
European Network for the Fair Sharing of Working Time
16 December 2020
How to ensure that everyone has enough to live on through the crisis and create good jobs that protect our planet.
23 November 2020
Economists call for changes to Bank’s mandate to help UK hit carbon zero target
19 November 2020