We need a transformation in welfare provision, but even more important are measures to tackle the underlying causes of inequality.
Anna Coote, Jane Franklin
04 May 2010
Over sixty years we have grown accustomed to benefits and services provided by the welfare state. All the while, the volume of provision has expanded exponentially, driven by a growing and ageing population, by rising public expectations, and in some cases, notably healthcare, by scientific advances and by supply driving up demand. This expansion was possible because the economy continued to grow.
Then came the collapse of global financial systems and a steep economic downturn from which ‘recovery’ is uncertain. Furthermore, the prospect of more economic growth is problematic: evidence suggests that growth in the ‘developed’ world cannot be ‘decoupled’ from carbon emissions sufficiently and in time to avoid catastrophic climate change.
So it makes sense to plan for minimal growth or none at all. In that case, what will become of the welfare state? Deep cuts are already planned by the Labour government and by the Tories — and neither party has yet contemplated a future without growth. What should be saved and what thrown overboard? More important, how could and should the welfare system be restructured?
Originally published in Soundings 44.
If you back a recovery plan based around great public services, protecting the planet and reducing inequality, please support NEF to build back better.
Ayeisha Thomas-Smith is joined by Kate Aronoff, staff writer at the New Republic
01 April 2021
With eight months until the COP climate summit, cutting our only major green stimulus policy doesn’t exactly scream ‘climate leadership’.
31 March 2021
Ayeisha Thomas-Smith is joined by Laurie Laybourn-Langton, co-author of the new book Planet On Fire, and NEF trustee
19 March 2021
Ayeisha Thomas-Smith is joined by New Statesman’s Britain editor, Anoosh Chakelian and David Hall, founder of the PSIRU at the University of Greenwich
05 February 2021