We need a transformation in welfare provision, but even more important are measures to tackle the underlying causes of inequality.
Anna Coote, Jane Franklin
04 May 2010
Over sixty years we have grown accustomed to benefits and services provided by the welfare state. All the while, the volume of provision has expanded exponentially, driven by a growing and ageing population, by rising public expectations, and in some cases, notably healthcare, by scientific advances and by supply driving up demand. This expansion was possible because the economy continued to grow.
Then came the collapse of global financial systems and a steep economic downturn from which ‘recovery’ is uncertain. Furthermore, the prospect of more economic growth is problematic: evidence suggests that growth in the ‘developed’ world cannot be ‘decoupled’ from carbon emissions sufficiently and in time to avoid catastrophic climate change.
So it makes sense to plan for minimal growth or none at all. In that case, what will become of the welfare state? Deep cuts are already planned by the Labour government and by the Tories — and neither party has yet contemplated a future without growth. What should be saved and what thrown overboard? More important, how could and should the welfare system be restructured?
Originally published in Soundings 44.
The New Economics Foundation depends on its supporters’ generosity. If you value what we do, please consider making a donation.
During a pandemic, the last thing we should be doing is putting more barriers in the way of access to healthcare.
13 March 2020
The Croydon Climate Crisis Commission will work to make the borough carbon neutral while lifting living standards.
12 March 2020
Over a hundred experts have signed a letter calling for Andrew Bailey to use the Bank to tackle the climate crisis.
Frank van Lerven
04 March 2020
The regional impact of Heathrow's third runway
Alex Chapman, Emmet Kiberd, Andrew Pendleton, Brell Wilson-Morris, Marc Postle
25 February 2020